Free 24-Week Plan
The 6-month LSAT study plan.
For applicants starting well ahead of their test date. Room for real foundations, deep concept mastery, and no cramming.
01 · Months 1–2
Untimed foundations
Read the full concept library. Drill every LR question type untimed. RC passage mapping introduced with generous time per passage.
02 · Month 3
Timed section work
Move to timed sections. One LR section daily, RC every other day. Deep blind review of every miss.
03 · Month 4
Full-length simulations
Two full-lengths per week under strict test-day conditions. Error log becomes the primary study artifact.
04 · Month 5
Weakness targeting
Half of each week attacks your worst two question types identified from full-length data. Second half maintains section timing.
05 · Month 6
Peak and taper
First three weeks: one final full-length weekly plus targeted drilling. Last week: sleep, review, and test-day dress rehearsal only.
Who this plan is for
The 6-month LSAT study plan is designed for applicants starting well ahead of their target test date, typically with a diagnostic 10+ points below their goal, or for first-time test-takers who want to build foundations without compression. It is the highest-ceiling plan on the site — students who execute it well routinely gain 15–25 scaled points from their diagnostic, more than any shorter timeline.
It is also the plan most likely to fail from lack of discipline. Six months of study is a long horizon, and the middle months (months 3 and 4) are where most students drift into passive re-reading and lose intensity. The structure below is designed to prevent that drift.
Why longer isn't automatically better
Six months only helps if you protect intensity through month five. Most 6-month plans fail because the middle months become passive re-reading of concept explanations. The fix: at least one timed section per day from month three onward, and a strict error log from month four onward. Ground the plan in the core concept library and re-test yourself weekly with a timed full-length simulation starting in month four.
A related failure mode: taking too many full-length simulations too early. Full-lengths before month four produce noisy score data, reinforce bad timing habits, and burn through the finite pool of official PrepTests. Save them for months 4–6.
Weekly time commitment
Aim for 10–15 hours per week across the full six months. That is a moderate load — sustainable for a working student or a full-time undergrad. Do not attempt 20+ hours per week over six months; the plan is engineered around the assumption that you will still have a life at month 5, and students who front-load hours consistently burn out in the middle months.
Phase-by-phase deep dive
Months 1–2 (Untimed foundations). This is the phase most students underrate. Read the full concept library once. Drill every LR question type untimed with a focus on naming the question type and the argument structure before touching answer choices. RC passage mapping introduced with generous time per passage (10+ minutes each). By the end of month 2, your untimed accuracy on every LR question type should be above 85%.
Month 3 (Timed section work). Introduce the 35-minute clock. One timed LR section daily, RC every other day. Blind review after every timed section — no exceptions. Your score will drop when timing is introduced; that is normal and does not mean the foundations phase was wasted. The goal of month 3 is to preserve your untimed accuracy under time pressure.
Month 4 (Full-length simulations). Two full-lengths per week under strict test-day conditions. The error log becomes the primary study artifact — you drill weakness types based on error-log frequency, not on external syllabus. This is the month with the largest measured score gains for most students.
Month 5 (Weakness targeting). Half of each week attacks your worst two question types identified from full-length data. Second half maintains section timing with mixed sets. This is the phase where fine-tuning happens — 1–3 scaled points from careful attention to specific weaknesses.
Month 6 (Peak and taper). First three weeks: one final full-length weekly plus targeted drilling of remaining weaknesses. Last week: pure taper. Sleep, error-log review, and one dress rehearsal on your exact test-day schedule.
How to avoid the mid-plan slump
Two habits keep intensity high through months 3–4: (1) a weekly check-in where you look at your error log and pick one specific weakness type to target the next week, and (2) a written weekly reflection — three sentences on what worked, what did not, and what changes for next week. Students who do both routinely report the plan feels progressively easier through month 4, not harder.
Full-length simulation budget
The 6-month plan uses 8–10 full-length simulations, all in months 4–6. That is roughly one every 10 days. Do not exceed this pace. Diminishing returns kick in hard after 10 simulations, and the fatigue cost of over-simulation is a documented cause of test-day underperformance. Save at least three official LSAC PrepTests for the final month.
Common questions
Should I take a full-length in month 1? Only the diagnostic. No further full-lengths until month 4.
What if I plateau in month 3? That is normal. Timed practice always drops accuracy relative to untimed. Continue the phase, focus on blind review, and re-benchmark at the end of month 3 before deciding whether to adjust.
Can I skip the untimed phase if I have a decent diagnostic? No. The 6-month plan is defined by its foundations phase. If you already have foundations and a decent baseline, the 12-week plan is a better fit.
Shorter timelines